kascebuy.blogg.se

Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth
Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth








difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth
  1. Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth plus#
  2. Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth professional#

Again, the vast majority of this is not corrupt.

Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth professional#

1) Revolving door means that the people advocating on behalf of the regulated have professional relationships or even personal friendships with the regulators and 2) the revolving door causes regulators to see the regulated as their peers, which naturally leads to a more sympathetic stance towards the regulated. The other caveat I have is that I think the biggest worry about the revolving door is not outright corruption – I go easy on you b/c I want a job from you – but two related phenomena. Whereas someone with, for example, a science background doesn’t get conflicts of interests issues beaten into their head throughout their schooling, or have some professional body that can ruin them if they screw around with this stuff. The legal profession also has been dealing with this and similar issues for quite a long time, and is pretty good at inculcating a sense that your loyalty is to your present client, not whoever you hope to work for. The incentives are less strong where regulators have different jobs (like writing the regulations or deciding whether or not to approve this or that project). One caveat to this is that the strongest case for this benefit of the revolving door is with respect to lawyers working enforcement type jobs – that is, the people whose job is to identify people breaking the law and to, depending on your job, bring criminal or civil charges. I don’t want to politicize this but if you follow what they are doing it is apparent to me as a lawyer and I think it also would be to a non-lawyer that the people on that case are very smart, very tough, and very aggressive. For examples of this – the number one revolving door legal job is the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York – their current most high profile case is the one against Michael Cohen.

difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth

Theory is also correct that the incentives for going back to the private sector are to make a name for yourself by winning big cases. “No revolving door” for these people is basically saying agree to what will, by your mid 30s, be a 90% pay cut for the rest of your career. The truth is, many if not most of these people are not doing it for the revolving door – they are genuinely interested in public service and tend to go back into the private sector because they start having kids and the salary gap just gets bigger every year you stay in government. In the legal field the revolving door attracts highly talented, ambitious, and aggressive lawyers into the government because they know there is a pay off. I’m also part of the big corporate law firm world and his description of the dynamics are 100% true in my experience and widely understood there as well. I’m commenting on the “ case for revolving doors” comment.įirst, I have roughly the same background as theory, the previous commenter. Congratulations to the subreddit on reaching 10,000 subscribers.

difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth

If you guys had just written this up as an adversarial collaboration, you could have been well on your way to winning $2000 by now.ģ. Comments of the week: a German economist explains ordoliberalism, a lawyer makes a surprising case for why one might not want to ban a revolving door from regulatory agencies to industry, Nabil al Dajjal tries to summarize the latest Hotel Concierge (if only there were something in between Nabil’s length and Concierge’s), and a bunch of people have a very long debate about why the FAA does what it does. See more information here – they seem to want “expressions of interest” by May 25.Ģ.

Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth plus#

The Future of Humanity Institute is starting a “Research Scholars Program”, offering salaried positions plus training and mentoring to early-career researchers interested in the same big-picture topics FHI is – AI, existential risk, far-future technologies, utilitarianism, and the like. You can also talk at the SSC subreddit or the SSC Discord server. Post about anything you want, ask random questions, whatever. This is the bi-weekly visible open thread (there are also hidden open threads twice a week you can reach through the Open Thread tab on the top of the page).










Difference between shrouded in sanity and freebirth